|
Discussion
Since basic facilities to carry out Neurophysiological tests were
not available, it was difficult to pin point as to how the G. Therapy
is working. Further research with modern facilities will throw more
light on this basic question.
The clinical improvements seen are not claims, but actual observations
in a substantially large number of patients of Cerebral Palsy and
Mental Retardation. All patients are video monitored. Opinions about
improvements by teachers, therapists, and parents are recorded.
Since they are always in contact with the patient, their opinions
give us correct picture.
It is seen that a wide range of pathologies and physical and cognitive
disorders are helped by G Therapy. Possibly in all these conditions
neuronal activity or the Neurotransmitters are affected and possibly
G Therapy works on the neurotransmitters or nerve growth factor
and so has shown a wide spectrum of action in all these disorders.
In all these patients before starting G Therapy, conventional treatment
like Occupational Therapy, Speech Therapy, and Symptomatic drug
treatment was tried. The response seen after G Therapy was much
greater than with the previous conventional treatment indicating
the efficacy of G Therapy.
A large number of patients above the age of 6 years have shown
significant recovery with G. Therapy. In this group natural recovery
is difficult but still this group has shown improvements in various
parameters. Few boys of 10 to 20 years age group have gained toilet
control after G Therapy. Few children of 10-15 years age group have
started walking independently after G Therapy. Cases of irreversible
brain damage have also shown positive response with G Therapy in
just a few months. All this indicates that there definitely exists
some neurophysiological improvement with G Therapy.
The results of G Therapy should be compared with results of other
interventions in vogue for cerebral palsy or mental disorders viz
Physiotherapy, Diazepam, Baclofen, Levodopa, Methylphenidate, Trihexiphenidyl,
Botox injection, Tendon release operations, Rhizotomy etc. G. Therapy
certainly qualifies itself to be evaluated as a safe adjunct to
various interventions carried for the above patients in total good
faith. In fact it has been seen in clinical practice that response
to other therapist is better if the child is already on G. Therapy,
as is explained under the previous heading of ‘ Functional Improvements’.
The degree of improvement seen in an individual case cannot be
predicted, and certainly depends on the amount of initial disability
present. G. Therapy does not claim that it can make every spastic
– walk, and the mentally retarded to achieve normal IQ. It should
also be noted that there is a definite number of patients who fail
to respond positively to G. Therapy.
The aim of any treatment is to help the sufferer and in these conditions
to bring functional improvements. Occupational Therapy, Speech Therapy,
Surgical Procedures do the same work, as also G Therapy. G Therapy
has shown persistent results in more than 2000 patients. And so
it is upto the developed countries with modern amenities and electrophysiological
studies available, to think, to test & to verify the efficacy of
G Therapy, so that it can be made available to all the needy individuals.
And I think Medical Organisations, Professionals and Researchers
can do a lot in this context.
Conclusion
This observation suggests that ‘G’ Therapy does have beneficial
effects on the Motor & Higher Mental Functions.
G Therapy if used alongwith rehabilitation in patients with C.P.
and M. R. can improve their quality of life & give enormous relief
to the parents and caretakers.
|